Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

Special Offer | $0.00

Join Today And Start a 30-Day Free Trial and Get Exclusive Member Benefits to Access Millions Books for Free!

Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

  • Download on iOS
  • Download on Android
  • Download on iOS

Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint)

University of Mississippi Law School
4.9/5 (17054 ratings)
Description:Excerpt from Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 These bonds had been donated to South Dakota as a gift by Schafer Brothers, New York brokers who held most of the North Carolina bonds then outstanding and which had not been turned in for adjustment following the attempt of the state, in 1879, to rehabilitate its credit. In anticipation of the gift the South Dakota legislature had passed an act authorizing the acceptance of such donations from private individuals and the right of the state to bring suit to enforce collection if this should be necessary. The bonds in question had been issued in 1867 by authority of the legislature of North Carolina for the primary purpose of providing funds for the completion of the Western North Carolina Railroad, a venture in which the state had an interest by reason of the ownership of stock. In 1849, the state had chartered the North Carolina Railroad Co. With shares of stock at $100 each, two-thirds of which were subscribed by the state. Bonds secured by the stock were issued in payment. The bonds of the second series, issued in 1867, were secured by a mortgage on the stock which the state held in the North Carolina Railroad. With each several bond a deed of mortgage for an equal amount of stock was executed and delivered. In 1879, the credit of the state had become so poor that commissioners were appointed to call in the outstanding bonds and make an equitable adjustment. Most of the bonds had been compromised and the holders had taken losses. Schafer Brothers held the majority of the original bonds still outstanding and had given ten of these, of the 1867 issue, to the State of South Dakota. Issued for a term of thirty years they were now past due. North Carolina in its answer to the bill denied both the jurisdiction of the Court and' the title of the plaintiff. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint). To get started finding Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint), you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.
Pages
Format
PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition
Publisher
Release
ISBN
1334595070

Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint)

University of Mississippi Law School
4.4/5 (1290744 ratings)
Description: Excerpt from Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 These bonds had been donated to South Dakota as a gift by Schafer Brothers, New York brokers who held most of the North Carolina bonds then outstanding and which had not been turned in for adjustment following the attempt of the state, in 1879, to rehabilitate its credit. In anticipation of the gift the South Dakota legislature had passed an act authorizing the acceptance of such donations from private individuals and the right of the state to bring suit to enforce collection if this should be necessary. The bonds in question had been issued in 1867 by authority of the legislature of North Carolina for the primary purpose of providing funds for the completion of the Western North Carolina Railroad, a venture in which the state had an interest by reason of the ownership of stock. In 1849, the state had chartered the North Carolina Railroad Co. With shares of stock at $100 each, two-thirds of which were subscribed by the state. Bonds secured by the stock were issued in payment. The bonds of the second series, issued in 1867, were secured by a mortgage on the stock which the state held in the North Carolina Railroad. With each several bond a deed of mortgage for an equal amount of stock was executed and delivered. In 1879, the credit of the state had become so poor that commissioners were appointed to call in the outstanding bonds and make an equitable adjustment. Most of the bonds had been compromised and the holders had taken losses. Schafer Brothers held the majority of the original bonds still outstanding and had given ten of these, of the 1867 issue, to the State of South Dakota. Issued for a term of thirty years they were now past due. North Carolina in its answer to the bill denied both the jurisdiction of the Court and' the title of the plaintiff. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint). To get started finding Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 7: December, 1934 (Classic Reprint), you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.
Pages
Format
PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition
Publisher
Release
ISBN
1334595070
loader