Read Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong

Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong

Magnus Vinding

4.9/5 (34069 ratings)

Description:This essay attacks the "happy meat" position head-on. It argues that this position is morally indefensible and that it not only causes immense amounts of animal suffering, but also, somewhat ironically, serves as the very foundation of our abuse of animals today - of our treating animals anything but well - and that this is all it ever will and can. This reveals the moral urgency of stopping the spread of this position and of rejecting it completely. "Magnus Vinding argues powerfully against eating "happy meat."" - Peter Singer, author of 'Animal Liberation'. "Like child abuse, animal abuse can be practised with more or less cruelty. Magnus Vinding argues persuasively that we shouldn't be doing it all. In his latest work, Vinding explores the insidious concept of "happy meat" - a tribute to the human capacity for self-deception. Harming other sentient beings should not be a life-style choice in any civilised society." - David Pearce, founder of BLTC Research and co-founder of Humanity+, author of 'The Hedonistic Imperative'.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong. To get started finding Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Pages: —

Format: PDF, EPUB & Kindle Edition

Publisher: —

Release: —

ISBN: 1500909653

Description: This essay attacks the "happy meat" position head-on. It argues that this position is morally indefensible and that it not only causes immense amounts of animal suffering, but also, somewhat ironically, serves as the very foundation of our abuse of animals today - of our treating animals anything but well - and that this is all it ever will and can. This reveals the moral urgency of stopping the spread of this position and of rejecting it completely. "Magnus Vinding argues powerfully against eating "happy meat."" - Peter Singer, author of 'Animal Liberation'. "Like child abuse, animal abuse can be practised with more or less cruelty. Magnus Vinding argues persuasively that we shouldn't be doing it all. In his latest work, Vinding explores the insidious concept of "happy meat" - a tribute to the human capacity for self-deception. Harming other sentient beings should not be a life-style choice in any civilised society." - David Pearce, founder of BLTC Research and co-founder of Humanity+, author of 'The Hedonistic Imperative'.We have made it easy for you to find a PDF Ebooks without any digging. And by having access to our ebooks online or by storing it on your computer, you have convenient answers with Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong. To get started finding Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong, you are right to find our website which has a comprehensive collection of manuals listed.
Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented.

Special Offer | $0.00

Special Offer! | $0.00

Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong

Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong

More Books

Why We Should Go Vegan

Why We Should Go Vegan

Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications

Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications

Effective Altruism: How Can We Best Help Others?

Effective Altruism: How Can We Best Help Others?

Reasoned Politics

Reasoned Politics

Anti-Natalism and the Future of Suffering: Why Negative Utilitarians Should Not Aim For Extinction

Anti-Natalism and the Future of Suffering: Why Negative Utilitarians Should Not Aim For Extinction

You Are Them

You Are Them

In Defense of Nuance

In Defense of Nuance

Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It

Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It

The Speciesism of Leaving Nature Alone and the Theoretical Case for “Wildlife Anti-Natalism”

The Speciesism of Leaving Nature Alone and the Theoretical Case for “Wildlife Anti-Natalism”